« TCP Selective ACK (SACK) Packet Recovery Analysis: Part 2 - The Analyzer | Main | Network Performance Management – Winners and Losers »

October 16, 2007

Comments

Oldcommguy

Scott - as usual a great article! I agree it is Great to have the Wi-Fi Alliance and they have and continue to try to guide this complex industry. On the question of what makes a standard, I guess I come from a time when they were more "Must Haves" (requirements) than "Nice or OK to Haves or Not Have" (Options). To me anytime a standard has many more options than requirements I begin to question if it a standard. As I look out over the standards industries I see many options and few requirements and I think that it is because the industry is really not that interested in someone telling them what and how to implement their products in a this competitive world and the standards industry have very limited power to enforce their efforts. Standards were created to guide the industry and support world wide interoperability. I feel that these central goals has been forgotten and in my humble opinion, a few requirements with many options does not make a standard. Remember I come from a different and stricter time. I am glad that we have organizations like the WiFi Alliance and without them and organizations like them there would be chaos in the technology world. I would just like to see more requirements make a standard and maybe put the options in a sub-standard like Gerald Combs and I discussed. We all need to support the standards industry and all help create and enforce the requirements. Thanks for your continued support of this Great Technology. Oldcommguy

The comments to this entry are closed.